- Grow 📧 Monetize
- Posts
- 📩 The best A/B test in email history just ran itself
📩 The best A/B test in email history just ran itself
Gmail accidentally proved everyone wrong about inbox placement
For two days in January, Gmail broke.
Not in a dramatic, servers-on-fire kind of way. More like a quiet miscategorization at scale. Promotional emails started landing in Primary. No tricks, no deliverability hacks. Gmail just glitched.
And for 48 hours, every newsletter operator got exactly what they'd been chasing for years. Primary inbox. The promised land.
Here's what the data actually showed.
The ones showing up in LLMs convert 3× better than Google
They optimized for LLMs, not just Google.
FAQs. Comparison pages. Transparent pricing. LinkedIn presence. These aren't vanity plays. They're what gets you cited in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude when your buyers are researching, your investors are looking, and your future hires are deciding where to work.
Download the free AEO Playbook for Startups from HubSpot and get the exact checklist. Five minutes to read.
The Numbers Nobody Wanted to See
Open rates went up. Mid-50s to mid-60s. Enough to get people excited, enough to feel like validation if you'd been blaming Promotions for your engagement problems.
Then the second metric came in.
Unsubscribes jumped from 0.29% to 0.45%. That's a 50%+ increase in people saying "I don't want this."
Not noise. Not a rounding error. A clear, consistent signal across accounts. It held for the full 48 hours.
So yeah, your emails got seen more. And more people decided they'd had enough.
Why Primary Actually Made Things Worse
Here's the thing most operators don't want to accept: Primary doesn't mean better. It means more intrusive.
When your email lands in Promotions, the subscriber goes there on purpose. They're in browsing mode. They made a choice to look at marketing content. That intent is baked into the open.
When your email lands in Primary, you're interrupting someone who came to check messages from their boss, their kid's school, their doctor. You didn't earn that placement. A bug handed it to you.
And users reacted exactly the way you'd expect. They didn't engage more. They opted out faster.
The Promotions tab isn't filtering out your audience. It's creating one. People who actually want to see what you're sending. That intent is worth more than any raw open rate number you'd get from forcing your way into Primary.
Email Still Wins. Here's How to Use It Better.
59% of Americans say most marketing emails offer no real value. That's not a threat, it's an opening. Get the AI-powered playbook for building email campaigns that actually convert.
Inside you'll discover:
How top brands achieve 3,600% ROI from email marketing
AI personalization techniques that drive 82% higher conversion rates
Tactics that have delivered 30% better open rates and 50% higher clickthroughs
How to build sequences for every stage of the customer journey, from welcome to re-engagement
Download your free AI-powered email marketing playbook today.
*Ad
What This Really Tells You About Your List
Same lists. Same content. Same day. Different tab placement.
The result was obvious: a subscriber who goes into Promotions and opens your email is a fundamentally different signal than a subscriber who opens because you landed in front of them uninvited.
Which means the metric that actually matters has nothing to do with tab placement. It's your clickers.
A 100K list with 5,000 clickers will outperform a 100K list with 500 clickers every single time. Doesn't matter what tab you land in. Doesn't matter how your open rate looks on any given day. The clickers are the asset. Everything else is a number you're paying to maintain.
Inbox placement is a lagging indicator. Engagement is the driver. Always has been.
Most people don't want to hear that because it means their list isn't as valuable as they think it is.
Your Move This Week
Pull your last 30-day clickers. That's your real list.
Build around them. Protect that segment. Expand from that segment. Treat every acquisition decision, every send frequency choice, every re-engagement campaign through the lens of how it affects that group.
Everything else is noise. Why audience ownership matters more now
This matters even more because search has become a less stable growth channel. Traffic that feels dependable can shrink quickly when algorithms change, referral patterns shift, or discovery features cool off. For publishers that still get meaningful traffic from sources like Google News or Discover, that dependency is real.
The more controllable channels now are the ones you can directly shape: email and paid acquisition. That makes audience capture far more urgent while organic traffic is still flowing. If visitors are arriving today, there needs to be a plan to convert the right ones before that window narrows.
Cleaning the list is not the same as giving up on people
Removing inactive readers from frequent sends does not mean writing them off forever. It means protecting inbox placement for the core audience, then using reactivation thoughtfully to bring back people who still have a reason to return.
That is the shift more teams need to make. Stop optimizing for raw size. Start optimizing for durable attention. The healthiest lists are not the biggest ones. They are the ones that keep earning the click.
Are you tracking agent views on your docs?
AI agents already outnumber human visitors to your docs — now you can track them.
*Ad



